Transformasi Pedagogis Guru IPA: Implementasi Lokakarya Deep Learning untuk Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Abad 21

Authors

  • Neni Hasnunidah Magister Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Soemantri Brojonegoro No. 1 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3254-688X
  • Tri Jalmo Magister Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Soemantri Brojonegoro No. 1 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2467-2704
  • Dewi Lengkana Magister Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Soemantri Brojonegoro No. 1 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6095-5552
  • Chansyanah Diawati Magister Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Soemantri Brojonegoro No. 1 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4640-9691
  • Pramita Sylvia Dewi Magister Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Soemantri Brojonegoro No. 1 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7365-7703

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/rp/v5i2.hal.76-88

Keywords:

21st century skills, deep learning, pedagogic transformation, science learning, workshop

Abstract

Curriculum transformation requires science teachers to master innovative learning design, but competence in applying Deep Learning approaches and 21st century skills assessment remains a challenge. This service aims to improve the understanding of junior high school/MTs science teachers about the philosophical foundations of deep learning, curriculum analysis and essential science content to support in-depth science learning, design science learning with a deep learning approach, and design a deep learning-oriented science learning assessment that integrates 21st Century Skills and SDGs issues. This activity was carried out using a participatory and reflective workshop method to 30 science teachers Junior High School/MTs which are members of the Subject Teacher Conference of Pringsewu and South Lampung Regencies. Program evaluations use the CIPP model that measures competency improvement through context, input, process, and product analysis. The results of the activity showed a significant increase in the understanding of the workshop participants. The final test results with good criteria on all training materials increased by 64.75% from the initial test results with poor criteria. The response of the participants was very positive with an average of 60% stating that this activity was beneficial and improved their professionalism. The workshop was shown to be effective in supporting teachers' pedagogical transformation, with the implication that similar approaches can be replicated for sustainable professional development on a wider scale.

References

Boettcher, F., & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in science education: A model-based framework. Science & Education, 20, 103–140.

Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2021). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice. Springer.

Halpern, D. F., & Dunn, D. S. (2021). Critical thinking: A model of intelligence for solving real-world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 22.

Hartati, P., Muchlis, E. E., & Susanta, A. (2024). Numeracy skills of students in solving geometry problems within the bengkulu context. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(3), 1518–1531.

Hasnunidah, N., Amanda, D. O., Meriza, N., Lengkana, D., & Dewi, P. S. (2024). Analysis of students’ higher order thinking skills on science subject using liveworksheet argumentative through discovery learning. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(1), 351–372.

Hastuti, K. P., & Aristin, N. F. (2022). Model Flippep-Case Project Untuk Meningkatkan Six Competency Skills. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).

Hsu, T.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Hung, Y.-T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310.

Kemendikbud, P. P. P., & Abduh, M. (2019). Panduan penulisan soal HOTS-higher order thinking skills.

Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (2012). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.

Muchson, M., Anas, M., & Forijati, R. (2025). Implementasi pembelajaran mendalam untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan di indonesia: tantangan dan strategi. Prosiding SEMDIKJAR (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran), 8, 199–212.

Muriati, S., Syam, U., Bakri, M., & Rampeng, R. (2025). Lokakarya pembelajaran dan asesmen. Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia, 5(1), 11–20.

Nadawina, N., Jaya, A., Ramadhanti, D., Imronudin, I., Fatchiatuzahro, F., Halim, A., & Jati, G. P. R. S. (2025). Penerapan pembelajaran deep learning dalam pendidikan di indonesia. Star Digital Publishing.

OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First Results from TALIS. OECD Publishing Paris.

Prasetyo, I., & Huda, M. (2018). Evaluasi program pelatihan guru menggunakan model kirkpatrick. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 25(2), 198–208.

Prawiyogi, A. G., & Rosalina, A. (2025). Deep Learning dalam pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar. Indonesia Emas Group.

Santrock. (2017). Educational psychology (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Saputra, H. (2024). Penguatan kemampuan peserta didik dalam menghadapi era society 5.0 melalui pembelajaran matematika. BERSATU: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, 2(2), 287–302.

Satar, S., Judijanto, L., Ramdlani, M. L., Husin, F., Zulkifli, Z., Yunus, M., Lolotandung, R., Ardiansyah, W., Trivena, T., & Suroso, S. (2024). Pembelajaran terpadu: hakikat dan strategi pembelajaran terpadu di SD. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Online] Retrieved from: Http://Www. Idtl. Org/Journal/Jam _05/Article01. Html.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 279–317). Springer.

Suci, Y. T., & Jamil, A. S. (2019). Hubungan tingkat kepuasan pelayanan dengan keberhasilan peserta pelatihan teknis bagi penyuluh pertanian. Jurnal Hexagro, 3(2).

Usman, A., Saluky, S., Hermania, B., Alfonsus, M. A., Junaidin, J., Abdul Wahab, P., Evi Resti, D., Darto, W., Nur Astri, F., & Siti, M. (2019). Peluang dan tantangan pendidikan di era industri 4.0 dan society 5.0.

Wang, C., Zhang, M., Sesunan, A., & Yolanda, L. (2023). Peran teknologi dalam transformasi pendidikan di Indonesia. Kemdikbud, 4(2), 1–7.

Zhang Nancy Robin G. Debbie M. Jennifer W. Christine S. & Katherine M. G, Z. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–83.

Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 2(2), 1–17.

Published

2025-12-28